- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. W.marsh 00:38, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't seem to pass notability issues. Have had trouble finding much reference to the company. It is also curious that the creator of the article is User:LDRA. It has been speedied (perhaps prematurely) at least once [1] and has been renominated for speedy deletion which was then removed [2]. Hopefully this will end that debate. Joe Jklin (T C) 01:10, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - non-notable also seems to be WP:SPAM. --Kf4bdy talk contribs 20:43, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I removed the {{db-spam}}. The Google scholar Google results are not insignificant. Some of the mentions appear trivial, some are authored by the founder, but does seem to have been given reasonable coverage in the technical press as demanded by the proposed WP:SOFTWARE guideline. This incarnation has potential CoI issues, but a previous version was authored by Derek farn (talk · contribs).
- Comment If someone wants to smerge it (Static code analysis may not be an appropriate target), that's fine by me. Angus McLellan (Talk) 15:25, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, W.marsh 16:47, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This does seem to be a significant product per angus. meshach 03:24, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep. The article has potential CoI issues but the software's real enough and is used extensively in the safety-critical systems industry. Probably belongs as an entry in a list of such tools... Pete Fenelon 02:01, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.