Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LG Extravert

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nakon 05:10, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

LG Extravert

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It's a phone, there doesn't seem to be anything overly special about it, and there is no indication of notability. Primefac (talk) 21:07, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

KeepBobherry Userspace Talk to me! Stuff I have done 21:11, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - there is really no evidence of notability here. Looks like it's going to be a permanent stub. I'm open to changing my view if it's improved, but Im not really seeing any sources right now. — kikichugirl ^oh hello! 05:18, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:29, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:30, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.
1. La, Lynn. (2012-05-02). "LG Extravert (Verizon)" (pages 1 and 2). CNET. Archived from the original (pages 1 and 2) on 2015-03-17. Retrieved 2015-03-17.
2. La, Lynn (2012-01-17). "QWERTY keyboard comes out of its shell with the LG Extravert". CNET. Archived from the original on 2015-03-17. Retrieved 2015-03-17.
3. Colon, Alex (2012-02-22). "LG Extravert (Verizon Wireless)". PC Magazine. Archived from the original on 2015-03-17. Retrieved 2015-03-17.
There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow LG Extravert to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".
Cunard (talk) 01:56, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Certainly plenty of sources to exceed GNG threshold. -- Fuzheado | Talk 14:10, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:24, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.