- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:15, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- LOL! (program) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No significant coverage per WP:N. SL93 (talk) 06:19, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays~! Babymissfortune 06:36, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays~! Babymissfortune 06:36, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ifnord (talk) 02:53, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ifnord (talk) 02:53, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Even on a ProQuest search to locate 13-year-old media coverage that wouldn't be likely to Google, I still found literally nothing. As always, television specials are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they existed — they need media coverage to get them over WP:GNG, Emmy or Gemini or Canadian Screen Award nominations, or other evidence of notability beyond simply existing, but this had none of that. Bearcat (talk) 19:53, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.