Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LOTUS self defense
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 18:22, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- LOTUS self defense (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
No case made for notability. Appears to be a small grouping of martial art clubs. Peter Rehse 10:42, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The article was originally tagged by me as a prod for the above reasons but that was contested by the original author who suggested (I would have anyway) that it be taken here.Peter Rehse 11:07, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I'm the "original author" - actually, I'm not as the article is from WP:AFC. When I created it I did some basic research and decided that although it is not widely practiced, there are several clubs across a number of US states which I thought made it sufficiently notable. I'm neutral - I contested the prod as a matter of form as the original author is in effect unable to do so. QuiteUnusual 16:39, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. SakotGrimshine 06:09, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no sources, no real claim to notability. Eluchil404 08:01, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.