- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:33, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- LP-E6 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Proprietary rechargeable camera battery; a temporary product that has no inherent notability. Entirely unreferenced, vendor-specific material likely to only have a single reliable source. Proposed deletion contested by new account created today, whose sole edits so far have been to revert nine proposed deletions. Altered Walter (talk) 09:01, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Altered Walter (talk) 09:01, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I was the original prodder, and Altered Walter has captured my reasoning from the prod post. The battery isn't notable for Wikipedia. We won't find references that provide any information about the subject that isn't simply parrotting a press release or a specificaiton sheet from the manufacturer. Unlike standardized batteries, this product-specific, vendor-proprietary battery isn't an interesting subject for any engineering or reference purpose. -- Mikeblas (talk) 17:03, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable. WP is not a product directory. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:33, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.