Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LS-Dom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 23:06, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

LS-Dom

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

LS-Dom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable artist who fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. Article also appears to be mostly promotional without a WP:NPOV and the only references come from the distribution platform DatPiff SamCordes^talk 07:28, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. SamCordes^talk 07:28, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. SamCordes^talk 07:28, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. SamCordes^talk 07:28, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete for lack of significant coverage in a custom Google search of music reliable sources. Not eligible for soft deletion, as the article was PROD'd in 2015. czar 19:46, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.