Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LSU Student Senate

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:51, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LSU Student Senate (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

The template being used is for the State Senate, not the LSU Student Senate, but the article looks as if it's potentially going to be a list of people, none of whom is notable enough to deserve an article, and therefore a list of non-notable people doesn't make them any more notable. Corvus cornix 23:10, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment The page was created by LSU's Solicitor General for the Student Government. Though for all we know, the page might soon be edited to be about the history of the LSU Student Government. - Cyborg Ninja 23:21, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • No matter who creates it, a list of the members of the LUS Student Senate is by default nothing but cruft. Corvus cornix 23:35, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment Um, I was supporting your argument with the evidence that it was created by a biased individual. However, like I said, there's no telling what the main purpose of the article is supposed to be. You're assuming it's just going to be a list of the people who currently serve, when in fact for all we know it could be about the history of the organization. - Cyborg Ninja 01:52, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Google up "LSU Student Senate" (and filtering out the sites for the university paper and the university itself) and you find only trivial mentions of this student body, none in reliable sources; not enough coverage to meet the notability guidelines for organizations. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 23:28, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Hold That Tiger indeed. Not notable. I doubt that the entire student government is even notable enough for its own article. (What the heck does a solicitor general do in student gov, anyway? Argue cases before the Board of Regents or something?) Realkyhick 00:00, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete *boggles* How does this even approach WP:N? --Bfigura ^(talk) 00:51, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. RS1900 10:14, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Keb25 11:02, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per all of the above. I could see an article being written about the student government of LSU being notable, but this does not assert it. Precedents per WP:ORG have included the student governments at New York University and St. Andrews in Scotland. Bearian 17:34, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.