- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 08:54, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Google hits: Logical UNifier of Extensive Transfer Arrays and LUNETA; neither are promising. Seems like NN techcruft. (|-- UlTiMuS 05:13, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - notability really doesn't apply to science, technology or math. WP:SPAM does, however. WilyD 12:50, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- This is an article about a trademarked product of a single company, as clearly stated in its first sentence, not an article about a subject in the fields of science, technology, or mathematics. The WP:CORP criteria for products and services apply. Uncle G 12:22, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- NO REASON FOR DELETION HAS BEEN STATED — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sercypie (talk • contribs) 2006-08-30 11:28:17
- The implied reason, given in the nomination, is that this product does not satisfy the WP:CORP criteria for products and services. Wikipedia is not a catalogue of every individual product sold by every individual company in the world. It is an encyclopaedia. If you wish to demonstrate that this product satisfies the WP:CORP criteria, then please cite sources to demonstrate this. This goes for ISIP, Talino, and EDSA (AfD discussion) too. Uncle G 12:22, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all, trademarked products, no notability shown. Adding ISIP and Talino to this AFD. NawlinWiki 14:21, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.