- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 21:30, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- La Conecta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No assertion of notability per WP:MUSIC, likely vanity, bandspam or vanispamcruftisement. AecisBrievenbus 15:03, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 22:52, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 22:52, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Darkspots (talk) 01:38, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete Very poorly written self-promotion ("a few months before they start to mess up the whole building and leave without paying nothing." is just precious)Rotovia (talk) 01:57, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:MUSIC. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 07:51, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Esradekan--CastAStone//₵₳$↑₳₴₮ʘ№€ 20:52, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above statements. Zenlax T C S 20:52, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.