Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Labuan independence Movement
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 23:58, 19 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This page is a hoax. No evidence from internet, media or, library search. Labuan is very real but there has been no independence movement. See Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Log/2005_September_11#Republic_of_Labuan for more details. LuiKhuntek 00:17, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Google says it's a hoax. The corresponding section in the Labuan article should be deleted as well. | Keithlaw (talk) (contribs) 00:54, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. 1 Google hit on Labuan Independence Movement namely Wikipedia see [1]. Real problems with Verifiability with this article. Capitalistroadster 01:01, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Sounds like a madeup country--Etyheryery 03:32, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Note the above voter is trolling.
- Note the above user has a name, nobody likes being reffered to in the 3rd person--Etyheryery 04:23, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Note that the honourable member can be referred to in the second person when his name becomes pronouncable. :-). Oh, and delete per nom. --Last Malthusian 11:15, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Note that referring to someone by name (as in "Etyheryery is trolling") is still referring to him/her in the third person. :P — Haeleth Talk
- Note that your article is about to be deleted. Descendall 19:27, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Note that referring to someone by name (as in "Etyheryery is trolling") is still referring to him/her in the third person. :P — Haeleth Talk
- Note that the honourable member can be referred to in the second person when his name becomes pronouncable. :-). Oh, and delete per nom. --Last Malthusian 11:15, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Note the above user has a name, nobody likes being reffered to in the 3rd person--Etyheryery 04:23, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Obvious deletion for a hoax. I'll see if the "contributor" has already been warned about vandalism. Geogre 03:39, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Contributor is a floating IP. Some edits are vandalism. Some are vandal fighting. So it goes. Geogre 03:40, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Hoax and an IP vandal; double trouble. doktorb 05:20, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Hoax. encephalon 08:35, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete in the absence of any evidence to suggest it's anything other than a hoax. — Haeleth Talk 13:55, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Gatecrasher 19:52, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.