Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laila Gallery Complex

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:00, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Laila Gallery Complex

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A7. No indication of importance, A3. No content. Source may not be reliable. Carwile2 (talk) 22:56, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 23:04, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 23:04, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 23:05, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest the nominator better acquaint himself with what A3 no content actually means. There is sufficient content to identify subject, clearly. It will, and should, simply come down to whether there are sufficient WP:RS to establish notabilityShawn in Montreal (talk) 23:10, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Fwiw, I've done an Arabic Google News archive search. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:56, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 16:48, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~, if no sources have surfaced. Carwile2 ^{*Shoot me a message*} 17:35, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot !vote twice on your own deletion nomination. You have nominated this article for deletion above and so your views on the matter are already clear. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:52, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:40, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.