- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 04:41, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Lance scheduler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
An article about an open source software projec. The article has no sources and has no assertion of notability, so clearly fails WP:GNG. I can find no evidence that such notability is likely to exist.: as far as I can tell this is a imnor hobby project with no real users and that has so far had no impact. Speedy delete request was (rightly) declined, the Prod was removed by the original author without comment, so here we are. Claviere (talk) 05:37, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 06:33, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:59, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 02:13, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - unreferenced, no indication of notability, created by an SPA so possibly promotional in nature. Dialectric (talk) 23:26, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.