- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 14:18, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Langwood chase (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Small Road with no meaningful claim to fame. Basically this small cul-de-sac hasn't received enough coverage independent of the subject to warrant an article. ∗ \ / (⁂) 11:18, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Mere existence doesn't warrant an article. - Mgm|(talk) 11:45, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Claim of importance is located between two parks. References do no exist to prove notable or verify an article. Drawn Some (talk) 14:37, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 14:42, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Clear case of WP:INDISCRIMINATE, mostly unverifiable or trivial information, this is what a street atlas is for. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 17:05, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - we do not need articles on every tiny street. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:10, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no indication of notability, originator has only one edit to create this article as a New page on my local road, London. MilborneOne (talk) 18:31, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.