- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Zoids: Genesis. MBisanz talk 02:42, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Lanstag (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This fictional weapon does not establish notability independent of Zoids through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research, trivial model details, and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, and this is too trivial to require any separate coverage. TTN (talk) 22:58, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- TTN obviously didn't read the article. Zoids are characters, not weapons. - Mgm|(talk) 10:48, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Zoids: Genesis. Even when no one bothers to cut down and merge a reduced amount of plot information to a character list, the name still remains a valid search term, so a redirect would be in order.- Mgm|(talk) 10:48, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Does not establish notability through significant coverage of real world context in reliable secondary sources independent of the subject. Merging will not result in real world context, so that doesn't solve the problem. Being a likely search term is not a reason to preserve the history of bad content; redirects can be creates after deletion. Whether the subject is a character or a weapon is irrelevant to this discussion, but being familiar with this fictional work, I think weapon is more accurate. Jay32183 (talk) 23:19, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.