This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Woohookitty 10:10, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
short stub, does not explain itself at all clearly. No indication that this technique is in wide use, or that this term is notable. Delete. DES (talk) 00:29, 1 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Compound dictdef, delete on a laptop. --fvw* 00:42, September 1, 2005 (UTC)
- delete no content DV8 2XL 00:52, 1 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. Jaxl | talk 02:59, 1 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete, because I do think that the term is in use, to teach Information Technology to students in developing countries, with little or no facilities. If this article is not deleted, I vote for it to be stubbed. -x42bn6 03:13, 1 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, bad dic def. - Mgm|(talk) 07:59, September 1, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete I have no idea how this could be expanded... Amren (talk) 16:42, 1 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- delete, the use of projectors is hardly new. And laptops not much better. It's really just a bad dic. def. Dismas 17:19, 1 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Pointless and can't be expanded. JChamberlin 19:21, 1 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete
- Delete Intentionally disruptive addition by constant vandal. --!!!!
- Delete; no real usable content. --Nlu 15:34, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.