- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Black Kite 00:33, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Last 2 Left (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
non notable website and systems Christ Thomas (talk) 09:30, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This page simply defines a new game format that has a pending patent application. It cites usage. The page follows guidelines and is in better compliance than many pages under the Fantasy Sports. It should not be deleted.
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:17, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per lack of significant coverage through multiple secondary sources independent of the topic. The patent link is a mislead and has nothing to do with the article, while the other sources look like they are self-published. MuZemike (talk) 02:07, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 16:58, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non notable. Trivial coverage is not enough to stabilish notability. Descíclope (talk) 03:48, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.