Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Last Exile - Plot

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Maxim_{(talk) (contributions)} 01:36, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last Exile - Plot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Wikipedia is not a collection of plot summaries. Rackabello 23:31, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, possible speedy per WP:CSD#G4, see Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Last_Exile_Plot. shoy 23:33, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete under criterion G4 (repost). Thanks for bringing that to our attention Rackabello 23:35, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete as a repost. Also, article was prodded and deleted from Last Exile Plot Summary on 2007-09-23. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 00:18, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge into parent article may be more expedient than a speedy. The main problem is that the parent article has forked this to a separate article, resulting in the continual recreations. Of course, by rights this can be speedied on sight, but we are likely to have to deal with this over and over unless we head this off at the pass by merging the content back to the parent article. --Jayron32|talk|contribs 03:11, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - As it stands, this is way too long to be merged into the parent article. A short summary could be included. --BelovedFreak 17:37, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete per everyone. JuJube 03:12, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NOT#PLOT. This is clearly unsuitable for inclusion. J-ſtan^Talk_Contribs 03:57, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NOT#PLOT. A short summary could be included in the main article but nothing like the size of this. --BelovedFreak 17:34, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I taken the opportunity to be bold and merged the plot article back into the main article. This should never have been split off into a separate article, which violates WP:NOT#PLOT and is not a valid way of dealing with an overly long plot section. --Farix (Talk) 21:10, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete per above. Does not warrent its own article. ffm 23:54, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • TheFarix's move seems a reasonable way to handle this. It looks as though this issue has been dealt with. How does everyone else feel? --Jayron32|talk|contribs 00:02, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• I think we can close this Rackabello 14:22, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete acknowledging Farix's merge. I agree with Rackabello, this issue appears to be resolved. ZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 14:49, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete the redirect. There is no reason to have a redirection article with that name. -- Magioladitis 13:06, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.