Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lateral Link

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:43, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lateral Link

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Lateral Link (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can find no independent sourcing of substance in the article or elsewhere. Fails WP:NCORP. Edwardx (talk) 23:29, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law, Companies, California, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:05, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: The sources do not provide WP:SIGCOV of the firm, as well as being mostly WP:PRIMARY. Fails WP:NCORP. Sophisticatedevening ^(talk) 21:09, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Insufficient WP:SIGCOV to meet GNG. Sources only prove existence, not notability. Fails 201.226.200.75 (talk) 23:25, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.