Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Latvian Association for Support of Disabled People

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Apart from the nominator, there were no "delete" comments PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 22:58, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Latvian Association for Support of Disabled People

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article doesn't show why is subject notable. No references or sources except link to the official site, which seems to be broken. Alex^{discussion ★} 17:53, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment unrelated to whether it deserves to be deleted or not, a lot of articles won't show why their subject is notable in the first revision, but unless it's an attack page, copyvio, vandalism or the like the creator should be given some time to develop the page. Nominating a subject which claims notability for deletion just two minutes after creation is bad form. Valenciano (talk) 17:59, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I highly doubt the nominator adequately performed WP:BEFORE in the 2 minutes between article creation and nomination. Clear violation of WP:DONTBITE. --Colapeninsula (talk) 18:19, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I informed the user about some basic stuff on Wikipedia and I'm putting this discussion on hold. The user has 24 hours to work on article. Then, if the article still meets the criteria for deletion, the discussion will be reopened. Alex^{discussion ★} 19:23, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latvia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.