- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. John254 17:24, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Lazarus Clamp (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Intro includes "undiscovered" and "largely invisible to promoters, labels and the press" which indicates it is not notable. RJFJR (talk) 17:01, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Marginal, but passes WP:MUSIC#C1 based on this and this. This and this don't hurt either. You shouldn't take too much notice of unsourced comments in the article. Articles themselves neither prove nor disprove notability. Only external sources do that.--Michig (talk) 18:03, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, passes WP:MUSIC#C1. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 20:13, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Subject meets WP:MUSIC#C1. — neuro(talk) 03:14, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 06:31, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 06:31, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.