Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leadership in 2020

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW. postdlf (talk) 06:01, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Leadership in 2020

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Confusing, unclear article that does not seem to have a clear purpose. smileguy91^talk 22:57, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is not an encyclopedic subject, and we are not a web hosting service or a blog. The author seems to be promoting a series of viewpoints that rely on original research and synthesis. I'd say it's snowing in June. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 23:05, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Lovely essay. Too bad we don't publish essays. In parts of the Southern Hemisphere, getting snow in June would be fairly commonplace. Stalwart111 23:52, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete One of those articles that doesn't meed the CSD criteria but clearly seems to contain a fair amount of OR, POV, and essentially a textbook case of WP:NOTESSAY. Mkdw ^talk 00:59, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Case study in being {{essaylike}}. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:30, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.