- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 05:38, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Lean assessment (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The term "lean assessment" exists, though as far as I can see only as a marketing slogan. Notability is therefore an issue, and no reliable sources demonstrating that are provided. Propose deletion or, possibly, merging into some appropriate article dealing with more general aspects of "lean". Favonian (talk) 19:04, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Original research, article reads like advertising. Lean is a buzzword for management currently. 83.254.210.47 (talk) 01:01, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 12:33, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per reason given by Favonian, and also on the basis that it is pure original research. Would be better in Wiktionary I think, Lord Spongefrog, (I am the Czar of all Russias!) 19:24, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Equal parts spam, OR, and garbage, without redeeming virtues. RayTalk 02:17, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.