Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Learning Enterprises
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete without prejudice to recreation based on independent, reliable secondary sources. MastCell Talk 23:05, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Learning Enterprises (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Contested prod. In its current form, this article is simply an advertisement; thus I say delete. The Evil Spartan 19:01, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, unless article can be heavily rewritten, and assert some kind of notability. Oli Filth 19:56, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep article in a sad state, but organization is subject of at least some nontrivial coverage from reliable published sources [1] [2]. Eleland 20:00, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete - It fails WP:COI, WP:RS, potentially WP:ORG, and maybe WP:SPAM, but if you can accurately add references and take the spammy side out I say keep it. --Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor (tαlk) 23:17, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep - Premature. I removed the worst of the spam, still needs work. Could be notable, I would like to see a list of universities and an answer to whether or not they are officially affiliated with them. WP:COI subject, but the article is only a week old so I say give it some time. -- Steve Hart 00:01, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.