Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Learning through play
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn DGG ( talk ) 19:15, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Learning through play (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Delete - appears to be a neologism. I have searched and can't seem to find reliable sources that demonstrate notability for this expression. I believe this article was created as a platform to link to Mimi Toys, an external link which I have now removed. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 17:42, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - While appreciating concern about the Mimi Toys link the term itself is well recognised. I imagine there is enough for a stand alone article which ties in with Jean Piaget, Seymour Papert et. al. If not an article then a redirect into something like Constructivism (learning theory) / Learning#Play / Play_(activity)#Childhood_and_play / Play value. Lame Name (talk) 18:40, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for the additional information with WP:RS. Nomination withdrawn. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 23:06, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep The topic has massive notability - just see the books link above. As the nominator has withdrawn, we are done here. Colonel Warden (talk) 19:03, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.