Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leave It to Beaver Money Maker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Leave it to Beaver; however, since the game was included in the article on April 4th, there is nothing of significance to merge. I am, therefore, redirecting. If the editors of the Leave it to Beaver article choose to merge this material according to the procedure set out at Help:Merge, the information remains in history. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 01:58, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Leave It to Beaver Money Maker

Non-notable board game, no historical significance except for being based on Leave it to Beaver, could certainly be merged. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 19:43, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Leave it to Beaver for its (the show's) cultural significance. This doesn't warrant an article on its own. [1] and [2]. Wisdom89 _{(_T / ^C)} 20:21, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per Wisdom89 archanamiya · talk 20:33, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, if the article could "certainly be merged" as the nominator says, it shouldn't be brought to AFD. Try using a {{merge}} tag next time. --Pixelface (talk) 20:46, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My vote was still to delete, I just said that any pertinent information could be merged. I wanted to leave that up to consensus. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 04:43, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The article doesn't say it was the Christmas sellout of the year, or was in print for decades, or is sought after by collectors, or anything else of the sort. It appears to be a rather ordinary board game that was loosely tied in with the TV show. Could be mentioned at the Beaver article with other contemporary tie-ins. WillOakland (talk) 22:12, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Leave it to Beaver. Luk suh 03:14, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What needs to be merged beyond "LITB was promoted with tie-in products, including a board came called 'LITB Money Maker'"? WillOakland (talk) 23:33, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Never heard of it until now. I say a merger is in order. WAVY 10 Fan (talk) 14:05, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and trim down so it won't dominate the TV article. Way too much detail for a short-lived game (it ain't Monopoly). Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 09:08, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.