Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Led Zeppelin covers and tributes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 01:40, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Led Zeppelin covers and tributes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A collection of Zep-trivia, unsourced and poorly written and organized. A list of covers and tributes is, in my opinion, unencyclopedic to begin with, besides the perennial problems in such lists of sourcing and notability of entries. Drmies (talk) 02:50, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the article's cousin, for the same reason: Tributes to Led Zeppelin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Drmies (talk) 02:51, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 05:23, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep but as one article. Editing and sourcing are both required but I don't see the subject as intrinsically unencyclopedic. Better as a separate article than cluttering up the band article, which is where this sort of content would likely be added if this article did not exist.--Michig (talk) 21:42, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, consolidate per Michig. Lots of sources about Zep tributes, I agree there's nothing unencyclopedic about it. --Arxiloxos (talk) 16:35, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and merge together, as above. Yes, this is one of those articles that is apt to get messy, but it's certainly notable. I would recommend merging Tributes to Led Zeppelin into Led Zeppelin covers and tributes, as the latter has the more useful title and more structure to it. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 01:52, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.