Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Legislative Juries
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 15:12, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Legislative Juries (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Interesting, but is simply a reproduction of someone's thesis which hasn't been reviewed. Kind of academic WP:SPAM. Student7 (talk) 19:03, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Seems more of an essay build on some synth than an article. Dennis Brown (talk) 02:07, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, The same article was submitted to WP:AFC a day after the creation of this one, please see Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Legislative Juries). I have declined it on the basis of WP:NOTESSAY particularly because it contains original research and synthesis. -France3470 (talk) 02:36, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: The author seems to be making useful edits to the AFC article so I can see no problem with deleting this one and letting them continue editing out of mainspace. -France3470 (talk) 02:59, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - even if it was a notable topic, this article would have to be completely re-written to be a Wikipedia article. Aboutmovies (talk) 06:45, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 21:44, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.