- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) czar · · 04:51, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Lenddo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lacks notability and appears to be an advertisement. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:09, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. FallingGravity (talk) 04:56, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. czar · · 07:02, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Perfectly factual and not an advertisement. Weak keep only because I am not satisfied that the awards are sufficient for notability, "startup" and "most innovative" can sometimes mean, "promising, but not yet notable". DGG ( talk ) 19:15, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per DGG's assessment. Many hits at Google [1] for cites. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 01:15, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.