- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep after rewrite.--May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| r 3 $ |-| t |-|) 09:45, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Dicdef plus collection of external links. Wikipedia is not the place for either. — Haeleth Talk 13:42, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and Expand, a notable subject in the field of education, potentially a rich article.Bjones 13:45, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki to Wikitionary per nomination. A two line description of a common term is not encyclopedic. The "collection of external links" is exactly three items long. Durova 14:04, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nominator. Dicdef. --MacRusgail 14:22, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, cleanup, expand. BD2412 T 17:12, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
- Keep but tag for cleanup. A lot of cleanup. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 21:50, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Since all but one sentence of the original article was flat-out wrong, I have rewritten it to describe the flow of a typical lesson. Denni ☯ 04:41, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- comment well done, much better :-) Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 11:59, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep improved article. Joyous | Talk 03:07, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.