Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LetsTrack (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:20, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

LetsTrack

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. Indian media sources should be viewed carefully, as they often present press releases as news WP:RSNOI, WP:ROUTINE. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 12:27, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 12:27, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and Haryana. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:53, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:28, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There's a fair bit out there but it's all routine stuff or dependent sources per WP:RSNOI when I look at it. Clearly a case of WP:SERIESA and, as @User:HighKing described in the previous AfD 6 years ago, a very active marketing department. FalconK (talk) 02:28, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:59, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Lots of paid PR/undiclosed COI/socks in the last AfD... I don't see much for sourcing, most are rated average reliability. This is about what I find --yourstory.com/2018/04/letstrack-raises-funding-1-7-million-led-us-based-investor-james-arthur -which is on the blacklist sites here, funding announcements and other PR items. Oaktree b (talk) 15:18, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Just a whole bunch of PR items in spammy links as I posted above. Probably trying to get better SEO results, but we aren't here for that. Oaktree b (talk) 15:19, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.