Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Levelism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:15, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Levelism

This article is from the same editor that brought us Rolling Ban (AfD discussion). I can find no evidence that there is a real think tank by this name, nor any reason to believe that the WWW site is genuine. There's no evidence to suggest that this is a real, documented, peer reviewed, and acknowledged part of human knowledge. It appears to be a complete fabrication from whole cloth. Uncle G (talk) 01:40, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. If the Corporate Statesmen "think tank" is the same as this outfit (which seems to be the only possibly relevant entity that turns up in a Web search), it would seem to be headquartered in a small suburban private residence. In any event, searches for "Avraam J. Dectis" and for "levelism" in conjunction with either "Corporate Statesmen" or "Dectis" turn up absolutely nothing with any connection to the article's topic. This unsourced article fails WP:V. Deor (talk) 04:53, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, the house seems to have a nice yard, but the suburban street doesn't seem to be where a corporation would be headquarted. Looks like OR unless sourced. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 05:50, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, original research about a non-notable neologism that somebody made up. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:25, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.