Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leveraged Commentary & Data

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to S&P Global. (non-admin closure) buidhe 09:48, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Leveraged Commentary & Data

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Leveraged Commentary & Data (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Störm (talk) 09:44, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:25, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:25, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to S&P Global although I'm not convinced even a redirect is necessary in this case. There are no indications of notability and not a single reference meets the criteria for establishing notability. Also, the articles states "Leveraged Commentary & Data (LCD) is a unit of S&P Global Market Intelligence, a division of S&P Global" where S&P Global Market Intelligence is redirected to the main article. Topic is not notable, fails GNG/NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 16:53, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.