Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lezak's Recurring Cycle (LRC)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 09:24, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Lezak's Recurring Cycle (LRC) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable theory by a TV weatherman. Google Scholar shows one withdrawn paper. I can't find any verifiable information; most of it emanates from his TV station or LRC Weather, LLC. Glenfarclas (talk) 03:08, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:08, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Can find no independent coverage, only blogs/message board posts and most google hits are by Lezak himself. -RunningOnBrains(talk) 05:04, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- DO NOT DELETE Many meteorologists have now caught to to this technique and are using. Some stations as far north as Wisconsin, and they have explained it. More coverage on the LRC -XenoDiagNostics(talk) 06:36, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- That's great, however we could use some sources to prove that this is notable. TheWeakWilled (T * G) 23:55, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 03:15, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no reliable third-party sources. Article created far too early; if this turns out to be notable, let's wait until it is covered in secondary sources and re-create the article then. — Miym (talk) 00:18, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.