Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LibInfo by Concepts Integrated
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:00, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- LibInfo by Concepts Integrated (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Disputed prod. Claims to be one of the most popular library automation software in South Asia but offers no evidence. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:30, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete even if it IS true (and we don't know), I still don't think it would be notable. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 21:24, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unreferenced, no 3rd party sources to establish notability, and created by single-purpose account, so possibly promotional in nature. Dialectric (talk) 23:36, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Can't establish notability, essentially no ghits for
libinfo "concepts integrated", SPA. (in any event would need a move to LibInfo) OSbornarfcontributionatoration 00:02, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply] - Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:10, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Dialectric. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 10:48, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.