- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 14:18, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- LibRESys (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I am unable to find significant coverage for this software. Fails WP:N. Joe Chill (talk) 01:19, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —Philosopher Let us reason together. 21:54, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - unreferenced, no indication of notability, created by an SPA so possibly spam/promotional in nature. Dialectric (talk) 17:03, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No coverage whatsoever in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 16:50, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - There doesn't seem to be notable third-party coverage on search engines, nothing on Google News. SwisterTwister talk 04:51, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.