- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge with Clive Robertson. KrakatoaKatie 23:39, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Libby Purvis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Nothing here suggests notability, except marriage to Clive Robertson, which in my view doesn't confer notability. Grahame (talk) 02:35, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 02:44, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with Clive Robertson. I agree she's insufficiently notable for an article of her own.--S Marshall (talk) 02:46, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with Clive Robertson. Fails the entertainer notability guideline - no significant fan base and no assertion of a unique contribution to her genre. TV roles are bit parts (appearances in single episodes in long-running serials) or as supporting cast in minor miniseries, and do not represent an enduring contribution to the field. A notable marriage is not sufficient either - the overall notability guideline makes clear notability is not automatically conferred by associating with notable people. Euryalus (talk) 03:47, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge Notability is not inherited. Mfield (talk) 04:07, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge article text with Clive Robertson (or else keep, if it goes that way), but keep something in the namespace at Libby Purvis, just to handle the disambig to Libby Purves. Don't just delete. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:11, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Article fails to establish notability in accordance with the criterion specified at WP:BIO. Dolphin51 (talk) 13:14, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Clive Robertson. Worthwhile as a section in that article, but just being the ex-wife of someone notable does not automatically make you notable yourself. Lankiveil (speak to me) 04:48, 9 August 2008 (UTC).[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.