Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Library and Information History Group
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:27, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Library and Information History Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No evidence whatsoever of the notability of this group. Claims, yes. Evidence, no. StarM 01:35, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. -- StarM 01:38, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- StarM 01:39, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. -- StarM 01:39, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete A list of groups might be appropriate on the page for the main organization, but this is excessive detail--even within my own profession. I am not recommending a merge, because the name is too nonspecific to be a useful redirect. DGG (talk) 04:01, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Reads like an ad. No organic content jbolden1517Talk 05:41, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:00, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom -Drdisque (talk) 02:32, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete spam, complete with instructions on how to join their maiing list (!!!) Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:31, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.