Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liddle Kidz Foundation
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 03:04, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Liddle Kidz Foundation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Little to no truly independent sources to establish notability; the sources already in article are minor references on trade websites. Google news, scholar and book searches I tried did not find any independent sources to establish notability. Yobol (talk) 16:49, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:16, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- References for Liddle Kidz Foundation
- Of 13 sources, 9 are sources independent of Liddle Kidz Foundation.
- Google news, scholar and book searches do not find results for many of the entries on Wikipedia.
- A Google search of "liddle kidz foundation" returns 471,000 results.
- A Google search of liddle kidz foundation returns 14,000 results.
- Sources 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13 are from sources independent of Liddle Kidz Foundation – they include:
- Touch Research Institute Published Research Articles in J Dev Behav Pediatr -
- (copyrighted text from http://www.handsonbabies.co.uk/train/accreditation/ removed by Gurt Posh (talk) 00:30, 28 July 2011 (UTC))[reply]
- (copyrighted text from http://www.prweb.com/releases/non-profit_goodwill/greatnonprofits_donors/prweb4598114.htm removed by Gurt Posh (talk) 00:30, 28 July 2011 (UTC))[reply]
- (copyrighted text from http://www2.guidestar.org/rxg/help/faqs/about-guidestar/index.aspx removed by Gurt Posh (talk) 00:30, 28 July 2011 (UTC))[reply]
- Massage Today & Massage Magazine –
- Both of these references are to professional healthcare publications. These publications are recognized as unbiased, industry leading publications.
- (copyrighted text from http://www.facebook.com/MassageMagazine?sk=info removed by Gurt Posh (talk) 00:30, 28 July 2011 (UTC))[reply]
- Massage Therapy Radio -
- Massage Therapy Radio is a professional, internationally broadcast radio program supporting the healthcare field of massage therapy. Industry experts and professionals are interviewed and profiled during their programming. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AmyEliz (talk • contribs) 15:34, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no evidence of notability per WP:ORG from WP:Reliable sources; borderline WP:SPAM. Gurt Posh (talk) 00:30, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per lack of third-party coverage, I didn't find any on both Yahoo! and Google. SwisterTwister talk 21:14, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no evidence of notability from verifiable, third-party references. jsfouche ☽☾Talk 14:08, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.