Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Life expectancy (concept)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:05, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Life expectancy (concept)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Life expectancy (concept) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I was about to nominate this for A10 as a duplicate of Life expectancy. However this does seem to expand upon the concept so what should be done here? Cleo Cooper (talk) 17:50, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• (Speedy) Delete A10 would seem entirely sensible here, the two are about the same concept, and this is a far shorter and less substantial text. If you think there's anything worth merging, go right ahead, but we should not have a CFORK. Delete without a redirect. Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:04, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly as a merge to Life expectancy Industrial Insect (talk) 18:07, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness and Mathematics. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:33, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Danielaanaiza, the creator, maybe you could explain why you created this article? You put Not to be confused with Life expectancy. on this article so you were aware of Life expectancy. Is there something we're missing? Cleo Cooper (talk) 01:22, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Completely redundant to Life expectancy and very OR-ish at points, to boot. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 02:34, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, We shouldn't hold articles which are redundant. Samoht27 (talk) 16:41, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: As per WP:REDUNDANTFORK. BlakeIsHereStudios (talk | contributions) 18:02, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.