Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Light Years Ahead
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JForget 02:44, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Light Years Ahead (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Almost no content, no refs, iBentalk/contribs 22:14, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fails Quality, not even enough to be a stub Alan - talk 17:19, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, should also have a look at the band's article. Geschichte (talk) 05:55, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I can find no significant coverage for this
songalbum in reliable sources; does not appear to satisfy WP:GNG or WP:NALBUMS. Gongshow Talk 19:47, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply] - Delete, not much more to say (like the article)--MrRadioGuy P T C E 03:07, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - It is apparently an album, not a song, but regardless, I am not finding any evidence of significant coverage. Rlendog (talk) 03:20, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.