Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lilo and stich experiment 221 sparky
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 20:03, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Subject is not notable enough for its own entry; description of character already exists at List of experiments from Lilo & Stitch. -- Merope 12:57, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I am also listing Leroy (Lilo & Stitch)628 and by the same author for the same reasons. -- Merope 13:02, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Uucp 13:40, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Sad Delete I hate voting for deletion, especially when it seems a child wrote the article. I hope this doesn't discourage the author from contributing. But this article contains research elsewhere on Wikipedia.Trevor 19:34, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I know how you feel--nominating it will probably incur bad karma. I did leave a note on the author's talk page about why I nominated the articles and directed him/her to work on the other page. -- Merope 19:44, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Aww, sweet. I wish I had a little daughter or a son like that. Such amazing little--speedy delete.-Kmaguir1 08:45, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I know how you feel--nominating it will probably incur bad karma. I did leave a note on the author's talk page about why I nominated the articles and directed him/her to work on the other page. -- Merope 19:44, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.