- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete both. Mailer Diablo 14:20, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
One-sentence boilerplate collection, makes no sense and is unreferenced--Zxcvbnm 02:43, 19 April 2006 (UTC) Limited Magic added to discussion by Fagstein 04:48, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable and OR. The article does make sense to me, but it sounds just like omnipotence, and I've never heard of a character that was omnipotent that wasn't some version of God. --Allen 02:53, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per OR (coining a new phrase) --AbsolutDan (talk) 03:50, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or merge into Worldbuilding, an article that appears to be the author's only other edit. It seems Limitless magic is a weak attempt to clairify a term that they may have coined there. -MrFizyx 16:52, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- If we do delete this, we should also get rid of Limited Magic while we're at it. -MrFizyx 21:39, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable. --Siva1979Talk to me 17:21, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Let's show our limitless magic through delete both. Fagstein 04:48, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all. —-- That Guy, From That Show! (esperanza) 2006-04-21 13:49
- Delete both terms seem made up by the author. --TheKoG (talk|contribs) 13:50, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.