Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Limonade (microframework)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fritzpoll (talk) 13:37, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Limonade (microframework)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable software - fails WP:N. It has some coverage here, but that's not in a particularly large amount of detail, and is only a single site - it doesn't, therefore, fulfil the WP:N requirements. Ironholds (talk) 12:38, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This has one external reference, to Linux magazine. That source would appear to be a third party source; but it also contains long quotations in a programming language, and as such would appear to be something with "limited readership and circulation". This is a PHP micro framework for rapid web development and prototyping, which also suggests limited general interest, and therefore lack of real notability. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:12, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Limited general interest doesn't necessarily indicate a lack of real notability. My problem with that reference is that while it does spend some time on Limonade most of the space used is taken up by coding examples - there's relatively little prose on the software, and the article itself only uses it as an example; Limonade is not the main subject. Ironholds (talk) 16:39, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 17:10, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - concur with the nominator that the one single Linux mag article isn't sufficient and I've found nothing else that can help establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 20:29, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.