Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Limor Blockman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 13:10, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Limor Blockman

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. The Vintage Feminist (talk) 01:02, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. The Vintage Feminist (talk) 01:17, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. The Vintage Feminist (talk) 01:17, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 February 7. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:21, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 07:02, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:48, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Article does need help, but Dr Limor is notable enough for an entry. I added additional citations to her page. A quick search shows several secondary sources discussing her work.Jewish Journal, HuffPost. I also noticed she seemingly was married, so she sometimes appears under the name Dr. Limor Blockman-Michelman, Dr. Limor Blockmanmichelman, or Dr. Limor Michelman, depending on the language and publication. Lonehexagon (talk) 19:44, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles is a community paper that anyone can submit an article to (journal's FAQs). The same author that wrote the article on Blockman, Ilana Angel, also writes the latest happenings from Real Housewives of New Jersey for the journal.
It's not that difficult to get something onto HuffPost, and Blockman only appears to have one article on it. --The Vintage Feminist (talk) 10:59, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:GNG states that a subject may be notable if they receive "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Anyone can submit an article to any newspaper, so I don't see how that's relevant here. The key factor is that both the Huffington Post and The Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles are unaffiliated secondary sources with an editorial process, and the authors of the articles were unaffiliated with the doctor. Wikipedia does not discriminate against local coverage (WP:ITSLOCAL). Lonehexagon (talk) 19:03, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The Huffigton Post does not have editorial control,and is therefore not a RS for anything except the opinion of its columnists, Certainly not BLP, and most certainly not the notability of BLPs. The JJGLA alone is not sufficient to support notability . Thje rest of the references are hopeless. I'm not saying she might not be notable , but just that there's no satisfactory evidence of it. DGG ( talk ) 20:29, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 23:02, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.