- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 17:55, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Lindsey Strutt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non notable former model WuhWuzDat 19:13, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I don't see any "former" about it, and there are GNews hits, so some WP:BEFORE needs to be done here - sorry I don't have time to do it myself -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:31, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:40, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - seems to be a pretty unremarkable adult model. I'm not seeing any particular indication of notability here. Robofish (talk) 16:03, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:15, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nn. Brumak (talk) 07:07, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless it can be significantly improved. Nothing of value or notable here. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 13:54, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.