- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:33, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Linea Pelle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable and wholly unreferenced. Fails WP:CORP Velella Velella Talk 21:02, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:14, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:14, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable. Reference links are self-referential. Google Search and Google News search find only press releases. Tone is very promotional. Even if everything claimed in the article is true, it is hard to see any notability. --MelanieN (talk) 03:59, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fails WP:CORP. Agree with MelanieN above. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 18:32, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.