Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lineage Chart for Ji Bong

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Tikiwont (talk) 08:56, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lineage Chart for Ji Bong (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Confusing. Is it just list of names or what? Me what do u want? _{Your Hancock Please} 01:07, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete While I respect this teacher and his lineage very much, I believe lineage charts should be reserved only for those masters who have been widely covered in verifiable sources. Ji Bong himself just barely meets our notability requirement, in my opinion, and as such a stand-alone lineage chart is not justified. We do have Seung Sahn Soen Sa Nim's lineage chart, but that is referenced and also documents the lineage of an extremely influential master. Perhaps the Ji Bong article could just link to that, which documents everyone but Ji Bong. (Mind meal (talk) 01:58, 2 April 2008 (UTC))[reply]
• Delete. Begone! It hurts my eyes. It doesn't read like an encyclopedia article and it fails to demonstrate notability. Qworty (talk) 02:26, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete. This is just basically a chinese family tree on a unnotable person, hoax Fattyjwoods ^{(Push my button)} 04:29, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This is definitely not a hoax, though Ji Bong is certainly not one of Seung Sahn's more notable Dharma heirs. (Mind meal (talk) 14:02, 2 April 2008 (UTC))[reply]

• Delete: Wikipedia is not a genealogy site. Utgard Loki (talk) 17:38, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Stifle (talk) 13:43, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.