- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Martinp23 13:23, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neologism and dic-def. Article proto-cites one source - something said by someone once on a TV programme - but goes no further. A quick Google produces 10,000-odd links, but these are almost all for "non-linear media". Those that are not are for the scientific term to do with waveform dynamics (would that we had an article on that subject... anyone... please?). There could very well be a good article here on either the linear form of "non-linear media", whatever that is, or waveforms in non-linear media; but this, sadly, is neither of those. I advise we delete the article. What do you think? ➨ ЯEDVERS 20:18, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The fourth word in the article states that it is a neologism. Delete. B.Wind 01:23, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, essentially per nom.--Kchase T 08:05, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.