Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lingea Lexicon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker^talk 00:30, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lingea Lexicon

Lingea Lexicon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is written like an advertisement and has failed to establish its notability since October 2010, by providing significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Codename Lisa (talk) 06:46, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator....William 12:30, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:34, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:35, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:NOTPROMO with extreme prejudice. Salting would also be nice, as advertisments have high chances of re-creation. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 14:44, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Promotional article and not notable. --Jersey92 (talk) 14:50, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.