- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete - Nabla (talk) 01:59, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- LinkBunch (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Delete Non notable website, autobiography. Enga3213 (talk) 06:42, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep Appears to be notable and reasonably established (going by Google). PeterSymonds | talk 09:42, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 17:00, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 18:20, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete. If it had references I'd say keep it, but without them I can't go with that. --JulesN Talk 20:24, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Ketsuekigata (talk) 22:46, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No WP:RS that can be easily found, fails per WP:WEB Gary King (talk) 19:16, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.